Recent Episodes
-
Why I joined DOGE
Jun 14, 2025 – 27:25 -
Are Trump's tariffs legal?
Jun 11, 2025 – 24:53 -
When Chinese manufacturing met Small Town, USA
Jun 6, 2025 – 31:03 -
Trump's crypto interests (Two Indicators)
Jun 4, 2025 – 18:13 -
The U.S.-China trade war, according to game theory
May 30, 2025 – 28:24 -
Why does the government fund research at universities?
May 28, 2025 – 27:11 -
The secret world behind those scammy text messages
May 23, 2025 – 34:24 -
How economists (and TikTok) know if a recession is coming
May 21, 2025 – 23:33 -
The 145% tariff already did its damage
May 16, 2025 – 26:53 -
What happened to U.S. farmers during the last trade war
May 14, 2025 – 25:30 -
Is the reign of the dollar over?
May 9, 2025 – 26:14 -
What "Made in China" actually means
May 7, 2025 – 27:00 -
Why it's so hard to find a public toilet
May 2, 2025 – 24:07 -
Planet Money complains. To learn.
Apr 30, 2025 – 25:51 -
How 23andMe's bankruptcy led to a run on the gene bank
Apr 26, 2025 – 30:58 -
A primer on the Federal Reserve's independence
Apr 23, 2025 – 19:52 -
How much for that egg
Apr 18, 2025 – 31:22 -
OIRA: The tiny office that's about to remake the federal government
Apr 16, 2025 – 26:57 -
Trade war dispatch from Canada
Apr 11, 2025 – 26:29 -
Do trade deficits matter?
Apr 9, 2025 – 23:37 -
How the War on Drugs got us... blueberries
Apr 4, 2025 – 27:57 -
Tariffs: What are they good for?
Apr 2, 2025 – 23:28 -
PM x Radiolab: Can the economy grow forever?
Mar 28, 2025 – 37:07 -
Planet Money buys a mystery diamond
Mar 26, 2025 – 32:22 -
Can we just change how we measure GDP?
Mar 21, 2025 – 22:16 -
Escheat show (Update)
Mar 19, 2025 – 22:42 -
How Tupperware took over our homes, with Decoder Ring
Mar 14, 2025 – 28:26 -
The last time we shrank the federal workforce
Mar 12, 2025 – 27:20 -
How to start a bank
Mar 7, 2025 – 25:52 -
The Parable of Peanut the Memecoin
Mar 5, 2025 – 34:44 -
The Memecoin Casino
Feb 28, 2025 – 28:11 -
The controversy over Tyson Foods' hiring of asylum seekers
Feb 27, 2025 – 25:03 -
The rise and fall of Long Term Capital Management
Feb 22, 2025 – 27:36 -
Can the president override Congress on spending?
Feb 19, 2025 – 22:14 -
The Big Government Money Pipe Freeze
Feb 14, 2025 – 25:52 -
The 'Crypto Wizard' vs. Nigeria
Feb 11, 2025 – 22:34 -
The fight for a legendary shipwreck's treasure
Feb 7, 2025 – 23:29 -
How the scratch off lottery changed America
Feb 5, 2025 – 29:42 -
How DeepSeek changed the market's mind
Feb 1, 2025 – 26:41 -
Re-imagining the energy grid ... through batteries (Two Indicators)
Jan 29, 2025 – 17:49 -
The "chilling effect" of deportations
Jan 25, 2025 – 23:15 -
After the fires
Jan 23, 2025 – 25:25 -
Tariffs, grocery prices and other listener questions
Jan 17, 2025 – 27:49 -
The Land of the Duty Free (classic)
Jan 15, 2025 – 20:19 -
The case for Fed Independence in the Nixon Tapes
Jan 11, 2025 – 30:43 -
ZIP Codes!
Jan 8, 2025 – 28:14 -
The potato-shaped loophole in free trade
Jan 3, 2025 – 27:54 -
If AI is so good, why are there still so many jobs for translators?
Dec 30, 2024 – 17:12 -
The Rest of the Story, 2024
Dec 27, 2024 – 28:29 -
The Indicators of this year and next
Dec 25, 2024 – 22:20
Recent Reviews
-
jumpingspider33This podcast is great!I love this podcast, and appreciate how it makes boring topics interesting. Keep up the great work!
-
Sweet Sugar x 10It’s gotten more emotional than economics-focusedThe hosts are coming from an increasingly emotional focus versus a rational, economics-based approach. I’d love to get the analysis and information in a more neutral manner
-
Juan Villa SoCalGreatOne of my top favorite shows to listen to. Keep doing what you’re doing.
-
Scooby-Doo❤️You guys are great!!!I love this podcast! The whole staff I appreciate, you put up with so much!
-
im njiHey ivan2gudI love planet money and it is a great podcast. Now I know I am being hypocritical but if you don’t like it then don’t leave a review. Just stop listening to it.
-
Nathan HershThe clear lesson from keith roamer to Amanda AronczykDon’t do deals with Keith he clearly cannot be trusted. On the other hand we now see why women get paid less than men as they keep telling us in this podcast. It only takes a few keiths to really skew income distributions
-
MomohboyhaDoesn’t stay on topicDoesn’t stay on topic and is very biased
-
rage550MehI’m interested in knowing the demograph you cater to The back and forth “story book” delivery is a miss
-
Nickname0000001263637373Wonderful PodcastI enjoy listening to this podcast. Thank you, NPR!
-
Economicsbuff2014Really good but politicsI mean I don’t mind politics form a non biased so this doesn’t affect me but maybe more Economics
-
SanBitGoldSending money to foreign countriesI have question about forex. When I send money to foreign countries e.g. sending USD from US to Indian Rupees (INR) as part of remittances. Does US government sends physical US dollars to India?
-
JrointhecityAmazingReally good
-
Buckystar00Most listened-to poddyThis is extremely informative and well reported, and addictive too - my favorite combo. (I think there’s been a little campaign from some quarters to mess w this podcasts ratings for political reasons, but it’s very fair reporting)
-
Ivan2gusBiased, leftist and defundedI m glad that NPR is defunded by Trump administration. They deserve it! The content is biased towards Trump and does not support my conservative values. Also, not donating or subscribing anymore!!
-
MR.Bitcoin.comDon’t hate on itDon’t hate on it it’s a great podcast
-
CrystalashPeddling fairy talesAfter years of making this show, the hosts still don’t seem to have a clue about how macroeconomics actually work. The story about how Fed’s interest manipulation helping with inflation—and all the fairy tales of the orthodox economics getting repeated on this show—without a drop of critical thinking or intellectual curiosity to ask the veracity of any of them astounds me. And this is supposed to be a public education program. Little wonder how the oligarchs can get away with so much.
-
USA MknitterFederal Reserve (April 23, 2025 podcast)Very, very poor recording — huge blank spots; please review and re-produce this particular podcast recording as it is appropriate to what is currently occurring with the President’s pressure on Chairman Powell.
-
Crusty_toes_Love!I am a child and this is one of my favorite economics podcasts because of the style and the whole way they provide information. I asked specifically for planet money plus for my birthday because I love this podcast so much!
-
reviewsfromthebasementDownhillI used to love this show. Everyday I would learn something new about economics and have balanced reporting. Today, garbage. While the potential positives of tariffs are interesting, there’s no economists besides one guy that isn’t associated with the Trump administration. At best the hosts imply that tariffs might not be positive for a developed economy like the United States. That’s it. No data, no experts, just propaganda. Garbage. Don’t comply in advance NPR.
-
SMAD4Escheat$500+ returned. I mean, it’s a solid podcast otherwise. But for the money, can’t be beat!
-
moving on-missuCheck pleaseSo sorry to see this program fail, was good. Terrible stories and research the bubble gum and popcorn they provide are without any meat. Unsubscribe, remove from library.
-
AnfiltPayment?Asking me to pay in apple podcasts to listen to a podcast that has changed from economics to politics. The show used to be so great. Good luck paying the bills as ratings and downloads fall.
-
x50netPlanet PoliticsI was enjoying the show but lately it seems more focused on politics than anything else. Show has drifted away from my interests.
-
Livingfree993Love itMakes commutes bearable
-
GOPGROUPSWOMENTThe reviews on here are absolutely incredibleI’m reading through the reviews and I’m just kinda of sick and tired of people trying to fabricate an excuse to go after the shows hosts and topics choices, expressing their valid genuine concerns. Leave investing and financial services to the pros and stop taking so Everything personal. Sorry your local community doesn’t help minorities and then you wonder why they turn on you. Great shows guys keep up the great work and don’t let these bias fabricated trigger words mean anything. It’s not like they have anything of value to say.
-
JustRihannaFav podwhat more can i say?
-
RoundAboutInvestKeep Pushing Narratives Barely related to Sound Analysis and data-driven FundamentalsGo woke go broke
-
MK in SCA few tips from the reviews and my own observationsI just started listening and reading transcripts of podcasts on my new phone. I have been a big fan of NPR for years and years. Slowly over the years NPR has expanded its offerings in an unbiased and very high quality of delivery. This has been good for the public as the amount of substantive and reliably truthful content has shrunken elsewhere. That said, in the last ten years or so, probably as the original staff have retired, NPR has tended to try too hard to sell itself to appeal to a different audience in ways that can be seen in the reviews. I think that the podcasts are an effort to meet this goal but it needs a little tending to improve delivery. The worst problem is one that a course in Speech would fix quickly. Enough with interrupting the flow of thought with multiple uses of “um” and “like” and brief diversions into another thought. Make it easier to follow your point by sticking to it to the end. Compare your audio to your transcripts please. You can easily see the confusion and frustrating mental struggle that results. NPR is a public radio that aims at lifting awareness and educating its audience. For goodness sakes, don’t fall into using poor English. Use proper grammar. Some of the public are learning to speak it and using you to do so. Many others just want to keep it up to scratch. Don’t disappoint them. Most of all, try to back away from diving headfirst into appearing to be politically biased, especially in apolitical topics. If you must to recap historical reality then do so coolly and without embellishment of personal bias. NPR is supported by personal funds for the public good. Balanced and factual information is needed to expand the audience. You are trying to persuade not indoctrinate. I, for one, am willing to hear views that run sideways with my beliefs and experiences, but not unless sprinkled with recognizably unvarnished facts. I enjoy NPR because of all its efforts and do support it as I can. It is the only radio that I listen to these days because of the student rhetoric, boring looping of thought, and careless lack of fact checking out in radio land. Podcasts are new. I am sorting through them NPR as a guide. Keep up the good work and sort through the reviews for their improvement. I will be listening!
-
mizzoutiger89AhahaJust listened to the DeepSeek episode as the host laughed his way through the recent market crash, laughed as a financial advisor had to explain this to his clients, etc. I’d so fire this host. Now, was that funny? The show has a weird tone to it in general that I’m just done with. This show just highlighted the bad side to the tipping point. hahaha
-
NoleazyKeep doing what you’re doing!I LOVE Planet Money! Keep it up!🤯🤯🤯❤️
-
CLB USDon’t recommendNo longer in my feed. The show is very biased. It’s not really about money or economics. It’s more about promoting liberal and leftist causes.
-
JT123@@Economics for those who reject basic economic principlesLacks all semblances of credibility. Socialist dribble as of 2025.
-
jay232466Smug liberal views, mehI used to love this show. Came back after 4 years and realized this is super liberal biased which doesn’t seam like a good strategy considering Trump won the popular vote… maybe I’ll be back in 4 more years to try again and see if they fix the bias (assuming they don’t get defunded).
-
Peter AlbrightFor childrenReally weird to hear adults try to discuss adult topics but as kindergarten teachers.
-
hdhdhebhfhfufn🧠You can learn so much I love it I love learning so if you like learning to then I suggest it for you
-
Latino MD/PhDVenezuela episodeA LOT of episodes lean very left politically, which is expected from NPR but this episode was just horrifying how they almost made Maduro appear as “unlucky” (their words, not mine) and mentioned nothing about the horrible communist actions that have led to the country being this way. They also gave false stats (5% emigration is false, actual number is closer to 25%) and made it seem like Chavez loved the poor and it was his great heart that lead to the downfall of Venezuela.
-
GopherTitanUnlistenableGood content if you can get by the commercials and wasteful “try hard” gibberish. Maybe I’m just not the segment you’re going after
-
ERISA1Too Many Commercials10 minutes into the program, 5 commercials and no content in between.
-
Lindsay8354Get On With ItI was excited to find a podcast about economics that was for those of us who aren’t experts in the area. The episode I chose was regarding tariffs to learn about the history of tariffs and the effects it had on the country and globe, but I couldn’t finish the podcast. I prefer direct and to the point without fluff and without the condescending tone. Do they talk slow, add unnecessary comments/fluff, and too many sound bites to make the episode longer? Listeners don’t want longer episodes (less is more). We want clear and concise episodes with an approachable tone.
-
KlittlelNew fanHonestly never been one for podcasts. Planet Money is one of the few i like. This episode about land lottery in Germany is so intriguing. Awesome idea for a story, and love the hosts here.
-
Lefty LandPlease stop with likePlease stop using “like” so much
-
jenzaharaSo annoyingSo, why do NPR hosts pause after every 2-3 words, in weird places? It's driving me so crazy that I may have to stop listening. Planet Money is a known offender. Also, in this episode titled "There Will be Flood", in the first minute we have an incorrect use of the subjct of an adective clause, and the misuse of the word "decimated". It's unprofessional. NPR needs a better copy editor.
-
NchalapdnxvHa5718153Just make it all adsAlmost 5 minutes of ads at the start of the episodes. It’s just title clickbait at this point. Just make the show, oops all ads, and call it a day.
-
AZ AsphaltGeorge Soros FinancePolitical lopsided episode. I am so disappointed in this episode. Within the first few minutes the hosts launched a political grenade (left = democratic, right = anti-Semitic). The episode was strong enough to stand on its own without bringing name calling into mix. I listen to PM b/c it is apolitical- it’s about money/finance. Please keep it that way.
-
Jimny Longfellow WashingtonUsed to be fact driven.Now it’s leaning heavily on progressive talking points. Especially on immigration issues.
-
George in MichiganWhy a paywall?I love the app and the content, but it is frustrating that something publicly supported like NPR has content stuck behind a paywall. As much as I want to listen to what is labeled as “bonus content”, even though it is just another episode, I am not going to pay for yet another subscription…I feel like the wave of subscriptions required these days is like death by a thousand paper cuts.
-
GladiateGoatExcellent PodExcellent Pod
-
CruzFanVeteran Loan CalamityThis episode quickly and calmly stoked my outrage at the VA. I doubt that the VA would have resolved anything had it not been for excellent and persistent reporting. Thanks for making me aware of this issue that seems to have largely gone unnoticed during this election year.
-
nmoralejaGreat Show- Behind the PaywallHi- I hate to leave this review, but I’m not sure how else to have my voice heard. This is a great show, but on the Spotify app every single episode- with only a couple of exceptions- is blocked behind a paywall. I understand that some episodes are extras or bonuses, but the last episode that isn’t behind a paywall is from September 16th and it’s not even a planet money original, it’s from 99PI. I want y’all to get paid, don’t get me wrong, but every single episode? I’m assuming this is a glitch for now, but I’m incredibly sad to have to let such a great podcast go and listen to shows that aren’t all behind a paywall.
-
AudreyIBCap and trade - provide more context on emissions statsYou say WA contributes “only” 0.3% of emissions - but this is more than many countries in the world. Irresponsible to make this number seem negligible while the US is responsible for the majority of historical emissions and continues to be a top emitter.
Similar Podcasts
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.